I suspect the RNG is based too much on nickname. There are 2 kinds of players here: extremely lucky and players with 0 colonies after hundreds of explorations. It is strange :/
I suspect the RNG is based too much on nickname. There are 2 kinds of players here: extremely lucky and players with 0 colonies after hundreds of explorations. It is strange :/
Coincidence?
I was twice in a row for lost explorers so it makes sense to me.
Posted using Partiko Android
Haha. I think people with average results are just quiet and people with interesting nicknames are more memorable.
I read a post by the wise @holger80 about why planets tend to be near planets https://steemit.com/nextcolony/@holger80/nextcolony-checking-if-the-8-explored-planets-are-valid
It turns out people look there first.
The solution if you find many planets is to get on that leaderboard and use your luck to control the galaxy. It's a chance those of us who are unlucky can only dream of.
Posted using Partiko Android
It does not make sense. Localization is not related to timeframe. Some people are extremely lucky - no matter where they send Explorers.
I know the formula is fine (md5 hash as a random seed), however the results are awkward :/
Very awkward. 2 planets is twice the production ability. It's a lot of RNG advantage
Posted using Partiko Android