I would appreciate a more diplomatic leader. I feel Trump is not. I feel others have a chance, but politics are more dramatic than bureaucratic. Social media plays a large role in this, I think negatively, but I hope that one could eventually use it positively. It’s similar to my stance on blockchain. Everyone suggests it’s a hoax, or has little effective use, but without a doubt the potential is there. It all depends on the user.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Not diplomatic yet somehow delivers best diplomatic results. E.g. first president to become bff with Kim.
Right. What kind of diplomat do you want ? He is finally correcting the last 3 presidents mistakes
A diplomatic diplomat. I hope that's not redundant, but we could define what the last three presidents mistakes were and highlight if they needed fixing or measure to prevent them in the first place. To prevent a problem assumes there's a single method to do so, which I acknowledge may not exist or be feasible. I liked the way Obama handled matters, I even like how Bush handled things. The matters that they handled will always be up for debate, of course.
Has that been helpful? I ask in complete curiosity. I haven't followed much of the discourse to know for myself.
Well, one of the main arguments of mainstream media was that Trump is a nuclear lunatic that will lead us in ww3 with Kim or Russia or whatever if he was elected president. Yet, he instead became the first US president to establish real diplomatic relationships with North Korea.
What do you think?