Yes, those knowing the coin will launch and renting all servers they could, even taking loans to do so, are better than others which also addresses why this was the case:
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yes, those knowing the coin will launch and renting all servers they could, even taking loans to do so, are better than others which also addresses why this was the case:
I know the story. I was BitShares early investor. Dan is a crook. It was wrong from the beginning. Where is the problem? In one premined stake or in all premined coins? I don't see any difference. For example you are using premined coins all the tim for @ocdb. It seems that you don't have any problem with that. You even have a name for that: the wisdom of the crowd. LOL
Not premine, ninjamine, there is a big difference. You literally used the word ninja in your post and then changed it. Yep we have many curators in our team and we curate late both to see what the crowd likes and to reward manual curation more.
Feel free to try shit on us cause you're butthurt you somehow got curangel after you, though. As far as I know they usually have good reasons to.
There is no difference between premine and ninjamine here. Curangel is just silly.
So you're voting for centralization, a unilateral takeover of a blockchain from a person who has plainly stated his intent on hard forking a key security feature out of the consensus code. And probably running all of those attack witness accounts on one server to boot. Really dude?
No, I'm voting for a person who is putting real money in STEEM, unlike various blockchain "keepers" who are constantly in Power Down mode. There is no one left here beside one big circle jerk.