i guess i didn't really explain it exactly right, it wasn't just to reference the dinosaur, it was to make it a little more artsy since one would think someone wouldn't have so much of an issue if it was very clearly not just a photograph. which it wasn't already, it's not like i was actually sitting in an airplane for that photo, everything about it is altered.. but i could imagine some negative nancy seeing it (especially if i wrote "hay tits check it out! check out my site for mooooreee~~~" and being filled with such rage that she would not realize it's not just a photograph and report it because her precious little billy's eyes might have seen it.
ofc i think the reason it was being rejected initially was due to machine learning algorithms that for some reason let very clear real pornography get through (i've had it show up on my feed there, like wtf) but thought this image was too much. i was thinking beyond that though cause i really didn't see how AI would flag this cause i'm sure they are trained to know what nipples look like. lolz
There are a lot of negative Nancy's out there. Pain in the chuff how some people get so hoity toity about what is seen by others. It's not like we don't all have bits lol!
some people have bytes
:0D