You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The horrendous failure of curating Quality Content

in #ocd • last year

That's actully a scary factor and kind of brings up a big negative of hive and curation trails/whales. It effectivly allows a single person or a collective group of a few people that have massive stake to mute or destroy someone on here. That's not such a decentralized thing and I know it's caused some issues in the past. How we solve that I'm unsure unless there was some type of weighted system maybe on whales where after 100k hive it starts to have a degraded vote of 90% of the power and continue to go down from there. I haven't got a clue but that was the first thing that came to mind.

last year in #ocd by
$0.51
  • Past Payouts $0.51
  • - Author $0.26
  • - Curators $0.26
4 votes
Reply 3
Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     last year (edited) 

    How we solve that I'm unsure unless there was some type of weighted system maybe on whales where after 100k hive it starts to have a degraded vote of 90% of the power and continue to go down from there.

    Limiting whale accounts like that will just cause whales to spread their stake over multiple accounts, completely defeating the limitation.

    See my other comments to this post for a couple of my latest suggestions.

    $0.00
      Reply
      [-]
       last year  

      Agree that the current downvoting group structure centralizes power to silence people in the hands of a few people.