you have one of the highest stakes but you give the least curation.
It's fun making shit up and talking out of your ass, but I prefer facts.
My voting CSI is the highest here, no self voting, almost 200 unique authors weekly, I give pretty significant votes (~$13-14 each), and expect nothing in return.
It's pretty well known, true - but just as well known: when the community got sick of all the bid bots, and revolted against them, marky didn't put up a big fight. He certainly had enough stake to do so, and obviously didn't think it was wrong on a personal level since he was doing it. He heard the feedback and changed. Sure, after he made some pretty pennies (he also bought a large stake, nobody pays for a bidbot with no upvote value), but it's not easy to listen to a chorus of people saying "what you're doing is wrong and we're going to start downvoting you're every move if you don't stop" and respond with "ok. sorry. I don't want to be a negative force in the community". Takes some guts and courage
Bullshit, I am very selective to who I curate, but occassionally they change over time as they get votes and abuse it, I quickly remove them as I discover it.
It's funny coming from you seeing as all you post is the peak of shit posts. Let's look at your last couple.
Even 3 cents is overrewarded for your garbage.
Ad hominem is the sign you have a fantastic argument.
It's fun making shit up and talking out of your ass, but I prefer facts.
My voting CSI is the highest here, no self voting, almost 200 unique authors weekly, I give pretty significant votes (~$13-14 each), and expect nothing in return.
I have two accounts this is only 1/3 of my voting power. I am also not the top stake holder.
No I wouldn’t upvote your book. Should be obvious after the farming and threats.
Your buddy sent threats.
It's pretty well known, true - but just as well known: when the community got sick of all the bid bots, and revolted against them, marky didn't put up a big fight. He certainly had enough stake to do so, and obviously didn't think it was wrong on a personal level since he was doing it. He heard the feedback and changed. Sure, after he made some pretty pennies (he also bought a large stake, nobody pays for a bidbot with no upvote value), but it's not easy to listen to a chorus of people saying "what you're doing is wrong and we're going to start downvoting you're every move if you don't stop" and respond with "ok. sorry. I don't want to be a negative force in the community". Takes some guts and courage
Bullshit, I am very selective to who I curate, but occassionally they change over time as they get votes and abuse it, I quickly remove them as I discover it.
It's funny coming from you seeing as all you post is the peak of shit posts. Let's look at your last couple.
Even 3 cents is overrewarded for your garbage.
Ad hominem is the sign you have a fantastic argument.