I don't know if there is a way to rule out bad actors as that is always going to be a matter of perspective. What I really like is that the structure seems capable of allowing community autonomy and self regulation without having to worry about the random millionaire or pre-mined power account to come in and do what they want. I'm sure both systems have their pros and cons, but I've seen plenty of one end of the spectrum and I want to see how the other operates for sure. Hopefully a "true community consensus" will be attainable on ONO without a massive amount of oversight.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I agree. There is a mechanism where by user reputation fluctuates and facilitates a much more realistic chance for many good posters to thrive over a few rich ones. If you arent using it you lose rep and someone else who is using it rises. Likewise if someone abuses it their reputation falls. Community is everyone who wants to be a part. That approach is interesting and worth a try.