Yes.
Any forks would need to be rolled back/occur before they can get their stake reembedded, if that is the intent.
Maybe they take what is their's and leave the community to sink or swim.
Maybe they stop hindering us to line their own pockets?
Maybe they work to maximize the coin.
Time, and the blockchain, will tell.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Also, what about this - say a few months from now someone wants to do an airdrop of tokens to all Steem token holders, but they want to exclude Steemit, Inc. from the airdrop.
I guess the exchanges would likely collect for their customers?
They could exclude any accounts they wanted to, yes?
Including exchanges.
No keys, no airdrop.
It shouldnt be too hard to spot the newly powered up accounts that all vote the same witnesses, either.
That is assuming that they keep funds on exchanges, and don’t move them to other hidden accounts on chain
34 new whales, 340 orcas, 3400 dolphins, or 34k minnows?
It shouldnt be that hard to filter for power up dates and cross check witness votes.
If stinc uses that stake collectively, most likely we can figure out who the bots are.
I do agree that it is better for ned to pull his head out and stop acting like he is some kind of superhuman, his feet stink just like everybody else.
I'd also like to see any fork to stop the damage make his stake available, at some point, but how long do we continue to put our souls into Ned's scheme to create bag holders?
Rolling back the chain to an earlier point in time can be extremely damaging to a lot of users and stakeholders.
It would be a headache, a customer service quagmire, but if folks wanted to try, who am i to stop them?
I dont think a fork is viable until the memory requirements drop one more time.
Commercial grade hardware is still required, yes?