Why quit by leaving a burden on us all to remember that account @personz does not belong to you anymore?
Because you are were an over-opinionated attention whore.
My account certainly has some value. 66 rep (lol), 2.5k followers...
Yeah, it is valuable to someone willing to impersonate you and most likely scam people along the way.
You'll be remembered as the person who hasn't been able to get @SadKitten code running in any stable manner after multiple commitments and more than a years or working on it.
You had many people's SPs delegated to it without feeling any shame about how broken it was.
I will lurk and see you on the next ship.
Hope you stick to the same usernames wherever you go.
Fuck you @transisto it was working really well as you know, it did a lot of work and those delegations were used actively. I did so much of what you asked, don't you dare slander me, it's you who should feel shame bro.
I'm just one voice.
I still had strong doubt about the consistency of it's flagging a week before it got shut down.
From checking our last DM:
25 days before final shutdown :
10 days before
9 days before
Since I won't be researching whether it was working properly or not the days before shutdown I'll assume it was and I apologize for what looks like slander.
It had not been working reliably enough or for long enough for me to risk promoting it widely like I had long planned.
Disappointed by the 1+ year it took but especially our interaction when I was pointing out it wasn't working as it should. - Now at least you know.
Giving out your keys with 100$ in to a random serves no purpose other than seeking undeserved attention to what must be an opinionated rant with more noise than substance.
The data I was talking about needing more of was on the v4 algorithm, the v3 algorithm was working the whole time until shutdown. That is if course except for the bugs and errors that happened in it's lifetime, which I was always committed to fixing as I did many many times.
There was a reliability problem I'll admit, the statistics were complicated for me and it was hard to verify data. However you are focusing on a less than 5% error, on the whole it was largely achieving it's aims. I poured hour after hour into that project, always riding torrents of abuse.
It's just cheap to say this to me here, I was transparent about what I was doing, what it required and how it operated.
I don't disagree that this post is "attention whoring", I'd prefer to say making a strong statement, but what's the difference? Just a level of class and perspective. Yeah I've got something to say, and I'm saying it, as I've always done. You don't like my post? Fine, I can live with that. It's probably not my best work.
Good to know you man, your words are your own. If you ever see a personz elsewhere it won't be me, I'm done with this skin.
Are you seriously leaving that flag on?