I even wonder how some people can submit more than one, it takes me hours to get mentally prepared enough to even write one.
To be honest I have not looked into how Oracle D award their upvotes, all I know is when the best are announced, I go read theirs so I can make mine better in the next task.
Throughout last year when I saw posts submitted to Oracle-D tasks, oh my, I used to aspire to be able to write such quality, not just because of the upvotes but because of opportunites it opens like @bozz mentioned in his comment.
This year I finally took the leap forward to begin trying out these tasks, not knowing I was already ready for it. The time I recieved my first Oracle-D upvote, Though small, was enough confirmation that I was unto something, and I could only get better.
I totally understand your plight, business wise, good quality reviews from people will only bring more businesses from outside, and even better incentives for the community.
I appreciate how Oracle-D has been working, I will love that the reputation of the community remains of utmost originality, quality and strict adherence to rules.
Nice calling bro.
In the end, I was still a bit more negative than I should have been. These small issues (because that's essentially what they are) are nothing in comparison with all the good that Oracle-D does.
They provide a lot of value to both Steem and the people that write for Oracle-D. I actually love the fact that they're giving people from different backgrounds a chance to earn and improve their writing.