I see it. And the community, as far as I can see, reacts against abusers.
my concern is about what will happen when the steem community will grow larger and no one will be able to monitor the whole flow.
we should think about it now that it's still manageable, and try to imagine the future framework
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
It is my hope we may have people that choose to be investigators. Perhaps they will dig into the blockchain form reports, etc. They will post their findings and reports much like @steemcleaners does for spam, plagiarism, etc. I suspect the community will reward them well for their efforts if they keep it unbiased and civil and just report their findings. If big people end up being revealed as doing something bad they might flag them, but then that is when we the community would need to up vote to counter those things.
As things get bigger I suspect blockchain investigators could become a viable type of person we end up having in this community.
I agree with @dwinblood, and I like the idea of unbiased investigators as well.
But honestly, I didn't give that scam a second glance, it was obviously too good to be true.
I didn't even know about it until I read @ats-david's post. :)
I second your idea, @dwinblood. As an intelligent person, I saw that and immediately saw a scam. But when I saw all those whales upvoting and vouching for the guy, it made me doubt myself, so I decided to watch his webinar.
I think unbiased third party members would be invaluable in helping people make their own decisions without being influenced by the opinions of the top Steemians.
agreed and mmmhmmm