You don't have the right to free speech on someone elses website.
truth is that there's some merit to this, but social media has stopped being a website and it's sort of become a public square. So yes, on paper I agree, but in practice it seems like we are filtering discourse.
The rules for YouTube are applied sparingly and randomly. Also, right at the heart of it, their rules are darn right illegal. If they are a public square, as they claim, then they need to follow section 230 of the communications decency act.