I don't do any of those things. I just say what I think is true.
Also you are the one popping off conspiracy nutt stuff. Obviously I am a Russian shill am I right?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I don't do any of those things. I just say what I think is true.
Also you are the one popping off conspiracy nutt stuff. Obviously I am a Russian shill am I right?
You operate in a right wing bubble, post ring wing content, and "think" trump winning is "inevitable", so that's definitely propagandizing for him.
You also never talk about policy, just abstract "theory" relating to "current affairs".
The sign of a conspiracy nutter is the lack of policy talk.
Nope. You are making shit up.
You worry more about who said something rather than what was said. In order for you to do that you have to make up a conspiracy that fits a narrative. You are definitely proposing conspiracies.
If you can't see how /pol/, styxhexenhammer, and dave rubin are in a right wing bubble, then by golly gosh you're all the way in there, DEEP.
I care about policy foremost, and the totality of someone's opinions when judging their character. It has nothing to do with who they are if they say something I agree with. Weird conspiracy, but you do have a knack for it.
They objectively are not right wing. Also again, you care more about who said something more than what was said. That means you are confused. You also don't care about policy. I disagree completely.
All you care about is ignoring topics in order to paint people as something rather than pay attention to policy.
Must have missed this part:
You're babbling at the wheel, bud. It's cringey.
Nope, the contents of the argument is all that matters. Its irrelevant who said it.
It's almost like nuance doesn't exist in your world. I truly wonder how you go about daily life thinking things are so black and white and that gray isn't even fathomable.
Also I already 100% know your basic talking points and can easily pretend to agree with you and debate other people with your arguments. Better than you can.
clearly not since everything you say reeks of cringe.
What are my talking points? Do this mock argument for me.
Well, its not exactly difficult. You are a far leftist, you are hoping for Bernie to come out ahead in the primaries. You lean pretty heavily for ending hate speech. You believe that antifa is about fighting against fascism. You believe that a anarchy communism is the end game. Black lives matter. She/her pronouns. White privilege is a serious concern. The police state is absolutely out of control.
You are also really awful at debating... You attack arguments with character assassination rather than substance which is not necessary. I am way more capable of arguing your general points than you are. All I have to do to beat you at your own game is simply stick to policy.
I attack you because you're an idiot and having a real debate with you is pointless. I asked you for one on discord like a year ago and you declined and blocked me!! Free speech amirite
I'm literally only talking to you so I can screencap your responses and laugh at you with friends on discord. The fact that you haven't realized that by now after a YEAR of these interactions is truly stunning. Truly.
I am extremely confident you would absolutely be incapable of mock arguing for my points. You don't even understand the topics well enough :)
Understand what topics? The ones you presented? I mean, if you knew what you were talking about you would definitely see how police forces are out of control, but sure, whatever bro 😂
Also love how "she/her pronouns" is a leftist ideology. That's icing on the cake. Dumbass.