So you lay out a bunch of stuff against Collins-Rector, then you tie it to Pierce because he worked at same company that went bankrupt, and was arrested and released without charge at the same time as Collins-Rector was arrested and charged.
I'm glad the legal burden of proof is a higher level than that of a random blogger spewing accusations on the internet.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Obviously you didn't watch the documentary. It's much more than working at the same company
Obviously i didn't. I read the summary that the blogger posted. It uses poor logic to indict Pierce. But perhaps he just sucks at writing summaries leaving out all of the important information and instead focusing on bankruptcies, political connections, and the actions of a 3rd party.