You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Are Good and Evil Really the Same as Light and Darkness?

I have been explaining this to people for a few decades:

"The contrast between light and dark need to exist for us to live, while the contrast of good and evil needing to exist -- or evil needing to exist to show us what good is -- for us to live is a fallacy. It only needs to exist in the internal subjective consciousness and as knowledge for us to share (recounts of past wrongs, creating new fictional simulations, but no new occurrences are required)."

I usually point out that evil only needs to have happened once in order for good to be seen in contrast to it forever.

You are one of the reasons I keep reading on steemit!

Sort:  

I usually point out that evil only needs to have happened once in order for good to be seen in contrast to it forever.

Yeah, and we can even imagine evils that have never even been created lol, yet don't need to create them.

Very true. I usually do not think of or reference the ability to imagine novel negatives in my own explanations. I will now.

Thanks.