I have been explaining this to people for a few decades:
"The contrast between light and dark need to exist for us to live, while the contrast of good and evil needing to exist -- or evil needing to exist to show us what good is -- for us to live is a fallacy. It only needs to exist in the internal subjective consciousness and as knowledge for us to share (recounts of past wrongs, creating new fictional simulations, but no new occurrences are required)."
I usually point out that evil only needs to have happened once in order for good to be seen in contrast to it forever.
You are one of the reasons I keep reading on steemit!
Yeah, and we can even imagine evils that have never even been created lol, yet don't need to create them.
Very true. I usually do not think of or reference the ability to imagine novel negatives in my own explanations. I will now.
Thanks.