Using it as a marker for status within a group makes a lot of sense, if it accurately reflects value provided to others in the group.
I was very close to including research that draws a distinction between status and power. As you point out, status can be understood as a function of the value provided to the group.
(I hope that came out alright... doing this from my phone)
Interesting. I think this may highlight a difference of opinion many AnCaps and AnComs have regarding the roll of money in society. AnComs may see it as a tool of powerful people to oppress others (which, as with any tool used by people intent on evil, is certainly true). AnCaps, on the other hand, see it as a non-coercive result of peaceful, voluntary, mutually beneficial trade, something which increases someone's status.
Maybe both are right and both are wrong in that the real problem is people intent on doing harm to others or, at the least, not looking out for those who can't help themselves.
Yeah, I think that's a good way of putting it.
I'd love to see your thoughts on this post by @xtester: https://steemit.com/steemit/@xtester/an-open-letter-to-the-community-in-defense-of-inequality