"sorry""random" bot abuser. He has done what he stated he would do. @grumpycat has stated many times and with his down votes of why. Disagreement on payout is a valid down vote. Disagreement on abuse is a valid downvote. @grumpycat has stated many times that the 3.5 days upvote is in his opinion abuse of the reward pool. Use of non compliant bots by individuals is considered abuse and reward pool theft thus reward disagreement on the part of @grumpycat. There is absolutely no reason to feel for any individual that @grumpycat flags. He does not care if you are a Rep of 25 or 75 he will downvote as he said a
collateral damage > illegitimate power
No such thing for either of these statements. Grumpy cat warned the bot owners what would happen, he has made post to let people know what will happen, if bot owners did not inform their clients that they may be downvoted/flagged by @grumpycat, then it is the bot owner that is responsible for the collateral damage.
illegitimate to the power he controls. Anyone that wants the same power that he has can invest, or purchase, or rent it, from any number of places. @grumpycat invested his money and powered that investment up. There is nothing
Wrong - the abuse of illegitimate power by the like of @grumpycat isn't something to applaud. You'll learn that for yourself, someday.