You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: If you go into something expecting idiocy, then idiocy is likely what you will find.

in #philosophy7 years ago

Even though it was an odd place to see it, I remember a small poster one of my second-line managers had on his door when I worked in IT:

"Silence is Acceptance."

Very well said.

Some people are "like Eckhart Tolle" in that they already understand the dynamics human interactions, along with the foibles and insecurities many bring to the table. When a person feels threatened by simple facts presented without judgment, it's usually a good indication that their ego is starting to fight for its life, as the foundations of their "unreality" becomes challenged by what simply IS.

I can think of noone better or more qualified to conduct these inquiries than you. I really like this community, and I have come to care about its long term survival and growth... and experience tells me that neither "survival" nor "growth" is likely to come on the back of deceptive and/or abusive practices.

Sort:  

"Silence is Acceptance."

realistically, the dolphins and minnows can't have that much impact in speaking up. If Steemit fails it won't be as a result of a system flaw...unless that is interpreted as considering the human factor as part of the system

humans have an intrinsic percentage of scumbags...and we see that play out here

If Steemit fails it won't be as a result of a system flaw...unless that is interpreted as considering the human factor as part of the system

Well, there's an entire research paper in there, somewhere. Indeed, it may not be the system that's flawed, but the builders of the system.

As you may recall, I've studied-- and been part of-- some 50+ "content sites with rewards" since 1999. Many were great ideas, and well executed. The SINGLE common thread behind why every single one failed was a certain naivete and/or gross underestimate by the founders of the sheer depth of human greed and selfishness. The "scumbag factor."

In a sense, nobody's to blame... it doesn't show up in "studies" or "market tests;" only direct observation reveals it. In a single paragraph, think of it like this:

If you announce "I have a cool new site that offers rewards for content!" you might draw 10-20% of the "legitimate" users out there, who will use your venue as intended... and could make it thrive. However, you will also draw close to 100% of the scumbags and exploiters... they will literally "cross the seven seas" if they catch the scent of even ten cents "for free" to be had.

Because you don't think that way, and I don't think that way, and I'm sure Dan and Ned didn't think that way... we end up with systems full of holes that can be exploited. And unless the scambags and bottom feeders are smacked down hard, they'll keep coming, bringing ever more ingenious automated exploits. Best thing we can do to ensure survival is to develop a reputation (in the "mining for freebies" community) for having ZERO TOLERANCE of any kind of spam/exploitation.

I agree with @stevescoins that this is worth a post of it's own.

this comment is worth a post of it's own; you should consider expanding on it a bit and posting it ;> let me know if you do so!

Thanks. I'm working on it... it's suffering a bit from "creeping elegance" because I decided to merge it with a couple of other rambles about the destructive power of spam.

well said indeed.

Yeah, one of them didn't like your words and illustrated the truths I have been speaking of, just as they have on this post itself.