You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: So, you're an anarchist?

in #philosophy7 years ago (edited)

No state is required. After this entire thread, I'm still not sure if you understand that important point or not. There is no "United States of Anarchy." The state, i.e. nation or country, of Anarchy will never exist.

I'm against royals as much as I am fascists and communists. If you are using government to control others, you are a tyrant. I don't care why you are controlling them either.

Humans do not need to be ruled. You may think they do because of your own personal fear, but they do not. Why?

The vast majority of humans are not predators. The predators naturally gravitate towards positions of power and control. Therefore, do not create those positions.

Do not give that small minority the ability to rule. Walk away from their systems. Don't create new ones. Any system of government, no matter what form it is, will eventually be taken over by oligarchs and rulers.

Sort:  

I disagree. The US is supposed to be a government of the people and by the people, voluntarily through representatives to weed out the concept of mob rule and to provide for the protection of the rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights. Without that and our fealty to Its principals we have nothing and are unprotected from the real vicious people in this world. Which are the Globalists who think and operate above the law.

That's cute if you really believe it. Setting aside the largest mass genocide of human history for a moment, the USA would have been better off staying as individual nation states. As in Virginia as one country, Maryland another, etc. Even at a "state" level though, it is tyrannical today. Back when the states were formed though, there was far more liberty and far less government.

What you wrote about the USA is a joke. It's a joke on us, or at least the people who know better than believing the lie. Governments routinely ignore documents. The USA documents are no exception. I'm more of a Declaration of Independence guy, not a Bill of Right's guy. Which Bill of Rights is still being honored?

Speaking of "Bills of Rights," you should check out Virginia's Article 13 of their so-called bill of rights. It was written way before the US Consitution too. Keep that in mind when you read the document.

Then realize we have come a VERY long way from that time period. We've gone in the wrong direction away from liberty too. And that's how these things work. No matter how genius the system is, powers consolidate and liberty shrinks over time.

I don't disagree with any of that which is why we need to get back to the constitutional levels of representation. 1:30,000. I won't post the link but you should check out what I wrote on the greatest conspiracy ever perpetrated in the US.

The government gives us a group savings discount so we all don't need to hire private security to protect ourselves from those who would do us harm. That's the idea anyway. And we pay taxes for it.

That's funny. What the government gives you it had to take from someone else.

The Government owns the sovereignty and jurisdiction. Everything it has it took or bought from England, Spain, France, Netherlands or the Natives; to regulate our lives as citizens. You were born with nothing, everything you have is from government protection of your property it lets you keep.

No, thanks anyway. It doesn't matter. The solution does not involve government. Government is force. You cannot have one without putting a gun to someone's head. I understand that to be wrong whether it is written down on paper or not.

True Government is force. Our government in the US at least professes to protect our rights.