Good, because that's not what I said at all. :-)
But that's how the argument you're making can be interpreted. One activity done at scale changes the responsibilities to society by the nature of the scale? I'm not convinced. If a service is valuable and people wish to pay for it, why does it matter if they pay 1 time, 10 times, 100 times, 1,000 times, etc...?
To turn to someone spending 60 hours a week barely making ends meet and say "you need to tend to yourself" is straight up victim blaming.
I'll flip this on its head and say to not help and encourage that person to obtain new skills (focus on themselves) so they can eventually work fewer hours and add more value to their community (i.e. get paid more) is worse. I think they would stay perpetually in a state of victimhood if they don't recognize the value of improving themselves and investing in themselves first instead of working like crazy for everyone else.
You can call that victim blaming if you want, but that mindset is what has broken every first generation rich person out of a state of having nothing to having much.