Interesting. I've never heard this before. I'm not really a fan though because:
I will someday cease to exist. Yes, technically the ashes of my decaying body could be put back together to form me if someone had perfect control of entropy and every atom in the universe, but that doesn't fit observed reality. Information is lost and can not be restored. I cease to exist is a more accurate statement for the shared understanding of identity and the word "I".
Sounds like word games to me. "One" is individual while "All" is collective. One is a subset of all based on subset theory which fits with our observed consensus and is supported by the continued usefulness of that convention.
This sounds good (karma and such), but if it can ever once be show to be false then it is not a Truth. There are many things I've invested time and energy into which did not give back. We can argue they gave back in other ways but that then becomes a non-falsifiable claim to become meaningless story telling.
It is really necessary to have an hour or two's explanation of these laws - their meaning is not obvious.
Thanks for a more detailed explanation. I may not agree, but I do appreciate it and find it interesting.