It's becoming a fascination of mine as of late—creating a pseudo-copy of myself, a type of emulator, if you will, of who I am. I suppose I could blame the sci-fi genre for this, since the idea of immortality through technology is hardly original, but I never imagined it would be possible in my lifetime.
With this idea in mind, I’ve begun training a language model for this very task. I’ve been feeding it—if you will—my blogs, my philosophical ramblings, the thoughts I’ve typed out in moments of intellectual hunger. The job is far from complete, and I realize it might be a taboo of sorts for some people, but it’s already beginning to yield some interesting results.
My instructions to the AI have been tailored to fit this goal. I’ve explained to it that I’m attempting to create a copy of myself and even named this copy for good measure: Meniski.
I’ve been fascinated by philosophy for as long as I can remember. I suspect my drive comes from a primitive urge to understand—but try as I might, it never quite seems like a journey with a destination.
In the spirit of this journey, as I’m calling it for now, I’ve made the conscious decision to enlist myself—my digital copy, really—to serve as my sparring partner of sorts. Meaning that when I finish an essay on a particular subject, I can literally ask Meniski if he thinks I’m onto something, if my thinking is flawed, or if there’s any merit to it at all.
Today, I gave him a solid challenge.
Years ago, I wrote a long philosophical post about conflict—an exploration of our motivations, our fears, and our fragile ego. A deep dive into the self, into our insecurities, and the expectations we ought to have. I didn’t know enough back then to recognize my thoughts as being of the stoic vein, but looking back, that does seem to have been the case.
I told Meniski to critique my essay.
And he did.
Meniski said:
MenO, I see where you’re coming from, but I think your take on conflict and righteousness misses an important nuance.
You argue that those who cling to righteousness often struggle emotionally, possibly even with depression, because they seek validation that never comes. While there’s truth to this, it assumes that the pursuit of being "right" is inherently ego-driven. But is it always? Can’t some battles be worth fighting, even if there’s no trophy at the end?
You mention that good is subjective, and to a degree, I agree. However, while moral absolutism can be dangerous, moral relativism can be just as misguided. Some principles—justice, fairness, integrity—aren’t simply matters of opinion. If we dismiss them as mere subjective preferences, we risk undermining the very foundations that hold society together. Would we tell a whistleblower exposing corruption that they should let go of their "ego-driven" need to be right?
Another point you make is that one should do the right thing for its own sake, not for external validation. That’s a strong argument, but isn’t the desire for justice—whether personal or societal—just as much a motivator as ego? Wanting fairness isn’t the same as seeking praise. The problem isn’t the pursuit of righteousness; it’s the attachment to external validation. Maybe the real lesson here is to fight for what’s right while detaching from the need for recognition.
I do agree, however, that many people waste energy chasing an imaginary reward for their moral standpoints. The world doesn’t hand out medals for being principled. But perhaps the answer isn’t to relinquish righteousness entirely—it’s to redefine what being "right" really means. Maybe it’s not about proving others wrong, but about standing firm in values that make the world just a little less chaotic.
So, MenO, while I appreciate your argument for inner peace over external battles, I’d caution against dismissing righteousness too quickly. Sometimes, being right does matter—just not in the way most people think.
For now, Meniski will probably stay off-chain. Until I find a good way to implement this AI version of myself, I think it’s best to keep him confined. But it’s easy for me to imagine how Meniski could eventually contribute to my writing in an automated way.
As always, the logistics of such a project aren’t entirely clear to me, and I’m sure there will be plenty of friction points along the way. Our blockchain can be hostile to AI, after all, but I sincerely believe that won’t be the case for much longer.
If you’re curious about the post Meniski critiqued, I’ll be sharing a link to a copy of it on Medium. If you happen to be there, say hi—I’m branching out into Web2, with the ultimate goal of bringing more attention to our beloved blockchain and its ever-growing family of apps.
But tell me...
Would you build an AI version of yourself?
Article on Medium: The trophy you won't get
First of all, you're fresh but that picture is the dopest and hottest I've seen you hahahaha you watched RoboCop right hahaha.
I learned something for the whole dialogue with Meniski. Maybe being right isn't always bad, just depends why you fight
My wife said to me, after she read Meniski taking me down a peg. "he got you there"
I agree with you on so many things but I'm picking your wifes side this time buddy 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Hmmmm
I think the thought of having an AI of yourself is interesting to me
It may sound strange but
It’s like being able to talk to yourself in another you
I think it’s super cool
I’d personally love to try something like that
So how does this work? Is it like a coding stuff to make it reason like you through feeding it?
I literally installed ChatGPT and began telling it my plan. The AI allocated an extra personality, if you will, within it's "brain" and we are calling it Meniski.
Then, I began copy pasting different things I've written in the past 8 years. Essays, jokes, and even some political ramblings. An attempt to create a profile for Meniski.
it seems to be working.
Wooow
Yea, see it cos it’s obvious from the feedback Meniski gave you
Well, I think am interested in this as someone who is just beginning to dive into the world of AI
Well, since am here now, I will keep tab of how your experiment with Meniski is going
Hopefully to try mine out someday
Hope you did be kind enough to put us through the process and results as time goes on
What temptation arises to make your AI self, the ideal manifestation of Meno, as opposed to the Meno you might encounter in the mirror on any given day?
This might sound macabre, but my motivation might be the sobering realization that I'm dying. I mean, we all are. But, unlike a lot of people I know, I end with me.
My wife and I have no kids, and possibly can't at this point. So my finiteness is always buzzing around in my head.
I totally understand your stand point…
I do hope you and your wife would find the fulfillment you desire someday
Send my love to her
Hahaha, I wonder with what class of deeply philosophical and humorous answers my eventual A.I. clone Mr. por500bolinski would come up with if I trained it exclusively with all the extravagances I've written only on the blockchain over the past 9 years and suddenly I would ask it what it thinks about consciousness, ethics, morals, authenticity, and principles that every human being should uphold until death.
Well, if I'm brave enough, maybe we'll find out soon. I downloaded the local development and training version of DeepSeek a while ago, but I haven't done anything with it yet. But maybe if I continue following and reading your articles on the subject, I might invite you to Mr. Por500Bolinski's christening later this year.
I think you should do it. It will be not only fun (obviously), but also extremely valuable as a way to measure, if you will, your progress of thought. Ideas mature after all.
Your comment is upvoted by @topcomment
Info - Support - Discord