One assumption that the simulation argument always makes is that there is a real world (or that there was), yet I personally consider it far more likely that we are in a simulation which does not actually reflect the "real world" completely. I think that it is far more likely that we are either a simplification of the real world, or the real world has a completely different set of natural laws, and we are either some sort of entertainment or artwork.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: