Post-edit: Turns out the author of the work itself 'my' interpretation is derived from is of questionable character - 'I' recant any support/affirmation for the author implied by posting this after having subsequent knowledge in-regards-to. [Not that 'I' agreed with most of the text, was primarily interested in the relation between Being-for-itself/in-itself, the theory is valid only in this context]. If further evidence nullifies this wariness the recantation will be recanted. Any attempt/pursuance at cyberstalking 'me' will be met with adequate force & exposure of the violating party.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: