Natural Order... How The World Should Be.

in #philosophy6 years ago (edited)

881933761097728000.jpg
Natural Order... How The World Should Be.

Morals are a very tricky topic in philosophy, no one has been able to prove that there are objectively right and wrong actions. The current trend is to say morals are "relative" and it only matters what the person or society calls right and wrong. This propaganda is put for deviants to justify their immoral behavior. The moral issue is very simple to know what is right and wrong by simple logic and a look at nature. Natural selection is pretty much agreed upon by everyone, evolutionists and creationists alike. If a group of people was born and they were naturally more inclined to suicide then this group would be much less likely to be able to out-compete a group that was less prone to suicide, and so the groups with the lowest inclination to suicide would be the most fit to survive and with enough time would replace all the groups with higher inclinations to suicide. This is common sense and no one would disagree with it. This is also why we have a strong inclination against suicide and try to prevent it.

This straightforward way of thinking can be taken through a gambit of issues and prove that they are objectively correct based on the current natural environment we live in. In fact, this logic would apply to any system that reaches a steady state with enough time. This does not mean we have reached the ideal state of natural selection where all traits for the immoral behaviors have had the time to be removed from humanity, but we will continue to move to this natural order.

Let's walk through a few more examples to disprove much of the nonsense being pushed on the public today. First, let's look at homosexuality, and show why it is against the natural order, though this is so obvious it does not need to be explained. If a group of men were all competing for females, and a few of those men were gay or bi-sexual the group that was straight would have a major reproductive advantage and in very short order the gay men's genes would be removed from the gene pool. This does not eliminate variability in genes and nature as well as environmental factors, so you can always have a very small amount of gay men pop up in society, and you currently see a rise in the number of gay men but this is due to the environment (poor diet, chemicals in plastics/water, and powerful people trying to reduce reproduction rates(eugenics)). So clearly being gay is deviant (against the natural order). Now this does not mean that we need to bash gays, but we need to realize they will suffer from going against the natural order, and many gay men are very troubled emotionally. This can easily be seen in suicide rates as well as dependency issues.

Next, let's look at murder, it too is pretty obvious, if you are prone to murder your fellow man, whether in a group or individually the same is true, you would be much less likely to reproduce, you would be the target for revenge and have a much higher chance of being killed when you are murdering someone else. You would also lower the chances of survival of your tribe/group. The same holds true if the whole tribe was murderous to other tribes, other tribes would be more likely to wipe you out and you and your neighboring tribes would be much more vulnerable to outside aggressors and natural predators that did not have these tendencies.

Rape is a bit more complicated. It is possible that this could survive natural selection to some degree, and in fact, many women have "rape fantasies". This might suggest that in fact, rape was a naturally selected trait on the first examination if a guy was to rape many women it would seem he would have a reproductive advantage. But, when we think about the issue a bit deeper, a woman that was raped and had no male to help raise the child would put the child at a much lower chance of survival, this would mean the genes would be less likely to be passed on, or at a reproductive disadvantage. Furthermore, there would likely be a much higher chance that these individuals would be murdered by loved ones of the rape victim or ostracized from society. This would cut off his access to women in short order and a male that was monogamous and won the affection of the woman would have many advantages over the rapist. The monogamous man would have constant access to mate with the female, she would be much more likely to seduce the man into mating when it was the best times for her to conceive where the rapist would be mating at more random times in her cycle, etc. Additionally, the offspring would stand much higher chances of survival to reproductive age with a stable father in the picture, and since human offspring require so much energy and attention to raise to reproductive age, this is a very critical necessity for a successful reproduction of genes. Clearly, rape would be a reproductive disadvantage.

Lastly, since this is such a repugnant issue and is trying to be normalized, let's look at pedophilia. Most of the same arguments against rape hold in this case. But, in addition to this, the chance for harming the children and leading to them not being able to reproduce is much higher. Furthermore, the pedophile is using their sexual reproduction capacity in a way that can not produce offspring, thus someone that did not do this and only used these energies for activities that could produce offspring would have a large reproductive advantage over a pedophile.

In current society, the parasite class running things are forcing society into a very unnatural order and they know they are doing this. No matter how you measure it people are much less happy then they have been a few decades ago. We instinctively know what the natural order should be and more outside that order we live the less happy we are. Until, we can start to think for ourselves, understand the natural order of the world, and live in accordance with it we will continue to be less and less happy until civilization itself will collapse. The elites know this, and they are racing against the clock to install a system of control that they believe will permanently subvert the natural order and subjugate it to their wills. This will never happen and everything will eventually return to the natural order it is only a question of how long it takes and if humans will still be around. For your own benefit and that of those around you, understand the natural order and try your best to live in accordance with it and defy the unnatural order being pushed upon us by all sides.

Thanks for reading :)

Oz

Sort:  

@ozzz169, I gave you a vote!
If you follow me, I will also follow you in return!
Enjoy some !popcorn courtesy of @nextgencrypto!

Congratulations @ozzz169! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

Award for the number of comments received

Click on the badge to view your Board of Honor.
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

To support your work, I also upvoted your post!

Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard:

SteemitBoard - Witness Update
SteemFest³ - SteemitBoard support the Travel Reimbursement Fund.

Support SteemitBoard's project! Vote for its witness and get one more award!

Congratulations @ozzz169! You received a personal award!

Happy Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 2 years!

You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking

Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard:

The Steem community has lost an epic member! Farewell @woflhart!
SteemitBoard - Witness Update
Do not miss the coming Rocky Mountain Steem Meetup and get a new community badge!
Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!