No, you are also wrong and making sh-t up. I find it really ridiculous for people to make these statements based on NOTHING except government slander. IF he tried to do anything, then why has he not been charged? Clearly they are interested in throwing the book at him, so why not actually charge him w this? Oh wait, maybe because it never happened? Or maybe because the agents that accused him of this are now in jail for corruption. They had access to the digital evidence used in court. Use of digital evidence sets a very dangerous precedent as it is easily manipulated. Since they are def felons that were stealing from the site, how can you possibly stand behind evidence that they had unfettered access to? They could literally take the chat logs and change anything in them at their own discretion. Please read the appeal and more information that is out there. Use some judgement and facts before making these types of statements.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: