Yes, it might first sound strange. But what he means by time is psychological time and not physical time. In that sense I think it is very revealing.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yes, it might first sound strange. But what he means by time is psychological time and not physical time. In that sense I think it is very revealing.
I have never heard of psychological time. Some things that I can think of that are related to time and psychology:
If you read the link on the last bullet point, I think what he is saying is close to my fourth bullet point (but I don't agree, other than to agree to the metaphor). Support for the fourth bullet point comes from above:
I would not agree that time is movement of thought, since I believe that time existed before any thoughts existed, but I can see the metaphor via the fourth bullet point.
I don't think we agree on the details, but I think we are thinking about something that has a lot of similarities.
thank you for the input @cnacws!
interestingly enough, I also recently came to realize that time is attached to motion in the physical world. The idea of it being an epiphenomenon makes sense to me.
I made a post about time a few months ago:
https://steemit.com/philosophy/@tobetada/584yk2-on-the-nature-of-time
Psychological time means the movement of thought. The "time" that it takes for thinking to transpire. Would there be (inner/psychological) time without thinking/thought?
It seems to me that there would only remain the time which you have pointed out: an epiphenomenon of movement in the physical world.