Hello @torico!
Thanks for using the realityhubs tag. However, this isn't a review. The realityhubs platform is meant for reviewers.
Do you know that there's a contest going on with 25,000 RHB to be won?
Please read our posting guidelines.
Please ask us questions on Discord
[RealityHubs Moderator]
i read that you accept posts on nature and photography in your intro post. you could have updated your word choice in your RH blog description, which might have led to less confusion. even reading it now, given what i've been told, i find your wording and premise confusing. i see many other people didn't understand it either, not just me.
fair enough that you down-voted to take the infinitesimal amount of RH reward i might have made, however you also hold 1000 sp in that account and therefore stole the SP that i was awarded elsewhere with that same downvote.
This is unacceptable. I will politely ask you to correct that error. I dare say I probably wont try to tag RH again because Im still not sure what you are looking for.
p.s how does one "review" nature? the premise is ludicrous.
Hi, @torico. First of all, thank you for recognizing and using realityhubs hash-tag. I apologise if you find the introduction post confusing. We got some complaints from other users who shared their concerns about not understand the message on the intro post, we immediately published a more detailed version of what the platform supports here.. RealityHubs is for "reviews" and you are welcome to review just anything. Reviewing something (A toad for example) is not just about introducing it or sharing pictures of it. You need to further evaluate, analyse, inspect what you are reviewing and finally give your verdict or opinion based on your perspective. You do not need to be overly professional, keeping it real, makes your review even more interesting to read and of course, brings value to the ecosystem.
While I believe that I have answered this in the first paragraph, I will be more precise here. I will use a toad as an example. There are different types of toad and when you want to "review" a toad, you need to be more specific and informative. There are different species of toad that exist across the continents. That is, the type of toad that can be found somewhere around Asia may likely not be the same type in Africa. There are many things to talk about which includes their behaviours, reactions to weather and so much more. You could also compare the same type of animals from a different continent with your post focus on their survival possibilities in a different kind of weather condition. I am not a zoologist so that all I can explain.
Again, I apologise if you feel that your reward got stolen. But that is not the case. I mean, that is obviously not how Steem works. The realityhubs tag was inappropriately used causing us to downvote your post ("Miscategorized content or spam"). If the downvote is for "Stealing" people's reward, then why was it created in the first place? Besides, the reward is not coming to our wallet so I do not consider this action a theft. It is rather appropriate and I am sorry if you find it annoying.
I am always around on our Discord server if you would like to understand more what "review" mean.
Cheers
when a reader upvotes, the RH tag rewards in token not SP. therefore it would be appropriate for you to downvote with RH token but NOT SP. this can easily be done by reducing the amount of SP in the RH downvote account. since the RH did not award me SP, i see no reason for it to subtract SP. does this make it clearer?
as for your description of "reviewing nature", this is not explained correctly for users of the english language. while the word review makes sense for products, there is no common use of that word in relation to nature. I think the words you are looking for are "a detailed analysis" or "a personal study". the use of review for this type of material will not be generally understood, imho. I suggest you explain this in more detail in a subsequent post, with the example that you gave me. With photographs it is similar. while people might review cameras, or photographers, for photos the words study or analysis would be used.
please see my questions and the reply in the comments section of this post.
https://steempeak.com/steempeak/@themarkymark/some-suggestions-for-steempeak#@themarkymark/pxkroj