Read your reply. First off, I’m not trying to rustle jimmies or anything but, a bunch of shit you wrote is objectively wrong(if needed i can point out specifics). Either you have poor reading comprehension or are intentionally misrepresenting information. What confuses me most is why you are even trying to justify yourself? It goes against your op, unless your attempt at authenticity was really a meta ploy for attention, whoa!?!? Nobody needs to get angry lets keep the discourse Socratic, but to that end maybe read Republic learn how to present a cohesive argument. Again this is not intended as an insult but a valid critique, hopefully you understand the difference.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: