Actually the "bible" is a corruption of the very word from our Creator (Torah), but close enough to show that you get my drift.
Many of those articles found in museums have been proven to be fraudulent as they are proved to be like maybe the tooth of a swine or similar. And the cyclic justification in which the geology proves the artifact and the artifact proves the geology is just silly.
Anyone can find a chip of bone or tooth and surmise what it might be or even label it as such. But that is considered fraud and is a crime against Mankind.
So you have your indoctrination and I have my beliefs and one of us has to be wrong. More and more evidence is being found which supports the ancient Torah narrative of Creation, but it is all circumvented, squashed and covered up. Less the truth be found out then catholicism would go bankrupt and professors careers would get ruined.
Indoctrination, are you sure you're applying that word correctly?
Not my example but it fits.
Science is constantly being refined as new discoveries are made, and old knowledge examined and reexamined.
You have new evidence, and more and more of it, that supports the Torah version of Creation?
Why not cite it?
Understanding Torah comes with much study and great sacrifice. I can no more help you to understand it than I could a swine the 6:00 News. It is beyond your ability to comprehend...
I'm certain it's well within my ability to comprehend.
I asked for evidence, which you professed to have, not to be insulted.
So, where is this evidence that proves your claim?
Well that would be the way that you would want to have it, but the Author has a much different requirement Sir. One tidbit I might be able to get you to understand is that you think in metaphors, symbolism and abstract philosophies all of which are from the Hellenized Greecian persuation and such is alien and foreign to the literal concrete perspective of practical thinking which is known in Torah.
So your claim is devoid of evidence then. "Literal concrete" evidence, that's all I am asking for, not metaphor, symbolism or abstract philosophies.
Several posts later, you haven't cited a single source nor provide any proof.
Good job at presuming to speak for your god; but that's always been how it works hasn't it?
The evidence has always been the witness of the Authors and Scribes who have documented such testimony in Yahuah's Torah Echad. It is all recorded, but not all believed...
Ancient records are not sufficient to be called evidence. "Authors" and "Scribes" is an appeal to authority, a logical fallacy, it's unwise to base an argument on such a week foundation. You did say you had new evidence that proves the Torah version of Creation (whatever that may be) accurate, but are unable to produce said evidence.