Watermarks take a second to remove in photoshop and are ugly so I wouldn't bother. I did end up sending a nice message and telling them to be more mindful in the future about how and whose pictures they use. We'll see if I get a response.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
You are right about watermarks, but deleting them is an extra step that they have to do and that implies the alteration.
Often the photos, being shared, saved, forwarded, etc., information about who is the author of the photo is lost. This is not the case with the watermark.
I am someone who hates watermarks, in fact mine are almost invisible...but they have often come in handy...
(I hope you understand the concept my English is learning)
Your English is fine :) I assume you also add your name and contact info into the metadata? I think most people wouldn’t think to check that.
I’ve kinda come to terms with the fact that putting your pictures on the internet puts them in risk of someone using them and you might not even find that out ever. It’s wrong but there are not many ways to fight it, I think the only thing would be to only upload really low resolution versions and only put up the good stuff when someone pays for it.