You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: (NSFW Contains Nudity 18+ Only) Calvin Klein Underwear Photoshoot ft. Denvermax (me)Part 2 of 2

in #photography8 years ago (edited)

Upvoted. As photographer/Photographic artist that does shoot erotic art and nudes. I read the discussion above as to weather is this Art or Porn.

What is ART is subjective even without nudity. And then you take that to a new level with explicit nudity as to what is porn.

The NSFW I have posted so far leans to the Art side more but I shoot this style as well sometimes.

I would say this is either Explicit Erotic Art or Artistic Porn. Either way, nice work by all involved, I like the really white Black & White.

Sort:  

Yes agreed. Very beautiful. I think a lot of these negative feelings that people have stem from discomfort with the human body. Nobody is offended by animals whose gentialia are often visible. These are peculiar hang ups if one thinks about them logically.

But animals don't make photos of their genitalia)))

No but people take photos of animals (and they don't censor them) and you can go outside your house and see a dog with his balls hanging out. It is a spurious argument.

May be animals don't sensor them because people feed them))). Anyway, there are always two camps. My opinion is it is too too...plus a woman shall have a secret)))

Thank you. It's nice to have a clear definition and I think you have help clarify the type of art it is.

No problem. ;)