all good, but i m just reposting a newsfeed that bypasses.
i heard steemit.com is for original content only - but i also heard that reblogging is here for some days...
It's an awesome photo but as fubar-bdhr said please remember to make a note of who actually took a photo if you post it, and link to their own page or something as well if you can. This is why I have downvoted this post.
Source: svalko.org/data/2016_09_16_13_00www_thisiscolossal_com_wp_content_uploads_2016_09_closeup.jpg
Not citing the source of photos, or using copyrighted photos, is plagiarism. Here is a post on why this is bad, and here is how easy it is to find allowed photos.
all good, but i m just reposting a newsfeed that bypasses.
i heard steemit.com is for original content only - but i also heard that reblogging is here for some days...
p.s. copyright owners, anyone?
https://lh6.ggpht.com/HlgucZ0ylJAfZgusynnUwxNIgIp5htNhShF559x3dRXiuy_UdP3UQVLYW6c
It's an awesome photo but as fubar-bdhr said please remember to make a note of who actually took a photo if you post it, and link to their own page or something as well if you can. This is why I have downvoted this post.
i also spotted 4-5 bots (accounts with names same, but differing in digits - like nextgen-11 nextgen13 ) who also downvoted, so you're not alone.
eventually all the authors going to be found, isn t this bvious? i d upvote your comment if it d show us all who s the author.
however - it s 5 minute task in 2016 to google where photo comes from (which year google bought tineye?) - yet you re downvoting.
coupe of weeks ago, we realised we do not need emails base :)
not for that email campaigns are wrong - but because all the people some or other way are on the radars already.
"Butterflies and caiman" by Mark Cowan https://royalsociety.org/journals/publishing-activities/photo-competition/2016-winners-runners-up/
That croc looks totally humiliated.