Hello all steemian.....
Aristotelian thinking about the State:
His thinking about the State is that the objective in the State is to achieve the salvation of all its inhabitants. The human meaning of its nature has a bad morality that can only be developed through relationships with others. Man is a social being, of the State form.
Aristotle classified into 3 parts:
1.Monarchi
2.Aristoteles
3.Politea (Democracy)
The best according to him is a combination of Aristolerasi
With Democracy
5 (five) scholastic philosophy leaders and their opinions:
- Aselmus (1033-1109) early scholastic period.
Arguing that the ratios can be used and the hadiths are used in religion. That does not mean that bahwarasio alone can achieve the truth of religion entirely. The religion or the belief can help the ratio, so that the trust will have a clearer understanding. About the relationship between ratios with religion in formulated with "credo ut in telligam" (I believe I understand). More explicitly that analsum argues that his philosophy is that: thinking must be in line with faith thanks...
Aselmus (1033-1109) early scholastic period.
Arguing that the ratios can be used and the hadiths are used in religion. That does not mean that bahwarasio alone can achieve the truth of religion entirely. The religion or the belief can help the ratio, so that the trust will have a clearer understanding. About the relationship between ratios with religion in formulated with "credo ut in telligam" (I