I've become very interested in PIVX. But I have a what-if scenario... What if opening up governance in this way is bad for PIVX? Would developers be forced to walk away from it or could former governance models (such as masternode only voting - which has worked so far) be reasserted?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I guess, we would discuss the problems created by the new governance and fix it. Having masternode only Governance is not something ANY of the masternode owners voted for, so it's highly unlikely it'll be reversed. To only have a wealthy sub-section of the community able to make ALL the decisions is not something anyone in PIVX seems to support, so if Governance takes a wrong turn, then We'll steer it in the right direction again, thats what good governance is all about.