Thats up to you. I think that 95% of the article is very good, and there are some bits that I do not like. I even thought of changing them, but that would not be fair to the original poster. However it would be imposible to find posts that I agree with 100% and I do not think censorship is the way.
Have you made your points to the original post? I think the way forward is to educate not to censor, but I realise some people differ. My attitude is live and let live, not deny people the chance to make up their own mind and throw the baby out with the bathwater.
What changes or ommissions would I have to make for you not to flag it?
Are people not allowed to reblog others posts?
If a ritual abusing, child killing satanist flagged the post, should it be withdrawn?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I am in complete agreement with you Cathy. I am of the 'take what resonates and leave the rest' point of view when it comes to most things. I absolutely do not agree with flagging a post because some of the content does not match one's own personal opinions, beliefs and/or world view. Besides, the contents of the article which you re-blogged reflect the thoughts and point of view of the author and not necessarily yours. That aside, I feel more strongly than ever especially these days that everyone is entitled to their opinion and has the right to express it as long as it does not result in the harm of others.
Thank you so much for posting this. I would have missed it if you hadn't reblogged it.