I recently saw a "debunking" video about pizzagate. There were some legitimate points about a few of the bits of evidence put out there. He then takes those inconsistencies to try and say that the entire scandal is false. (composition fallacy, or False Dichotomy). It is pitiful that people need to become coincidence theorists to defend their authority worship. If you can't connect the dots from so many overwhelming points to see the pattern, you are living in a dream world.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Well said! Most "debunkings" do this, they frame the issue in a ridiculous way thats easy to disprove whilst ignoring a huge amount of supporting evidence and decades of history and whistleblower/victim testimonies..