🍕#PizzaGate Part 16: Alex Jones vs. Bill Clinton (DTube)

In #PizzaGate Part 16, I go over a very interesting thought experiment on the very bold claim that Alex Jones has pushed for years accusing former United States President Bill Clinton of being a rapist. What’s interesting is not so much the claim by the well-known Infowars.com founder Alex Jones but rather the complete and utter silence by Bill Clinton. This is strange because of a number of reasons, namely, if Bill Clinton was innocent, then he can easily sue Alex Jones for libel and defamation. This would force Alex Jones to either provide evidence of Bill Clinton actually being a rapist, or retract his statements, and not to mention formally apologizing and possibly even having to pay a large dollar amount, which could cripple the Infowars website and media company. But the fact that Bill Clinton has been quite and not sued may actually suggest that he is indeed a rapist, without actually needing to bring up any actual evidence.

I initially posted this thought experiment on Voat.co (https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1672127) to get feedback from the #PizzaGate research community, and several counter-arguments were brought up. Some of them include that it would be difficult for Bill Clinton to prove libel, Alex Jones is just stating his opinion, and Alex Jones can play the “crazy” card in stating that no reasonable person can believe him. In this video I address all these arguments and show that none of them would hold up in court. This is because Alex Jones purposely stated as a matter of fact that Bill Clinton is a rapist, even going so far as paying his audience in a contest to wear T-Shirts that Infowars sells with Bill Clinton on it and the word “Rape”. Not only that but, Infowars has a very large audience, and Alex Jones even has a personal relationship with the current President of the United States, Donald Trump. Thus it is clear that despite the smear campaigns by the Mainstream Media, Infowars would be considered as being credible in the minds of millions of people, thus would be viewed as such in the court of law. Also, I show that libel cases are pretty straight forward, and that First Lady Melania Trump has already sued a small blogger and a large, Webster Tarpley, which she settled with, and the large mainstream news outlet the Daily Mail, which the lawsuit is currently still underway. In both instances, the blogger and the Daily Mail have apologized and retracted their statements. Even relatively small-scale YouTubers are able to get large media outlets to retract libelous claims, such as the case with Mark Dice and The Guardian.

Also, given the recent blatant censorship of Infowars, namely by Google affiliate AdRoll banning Infowars from their ad network, and Apple/iTunes censoring the extremely viral #911 Joe Rogan Alex Jones podcast, it is clear that Alex Jones and Infowars are actively being silenced. Now the best way to do so would be actually a lawsuit by Bill Clinton, which combined with the Mainstream Media picking up the story and pushing for Donald Trump to disavow Infowars, it could be a giant blow to Alex Jones…. But this depends on whether Bill Clinton is actually innocent. The fact that he hasn’t, and given Alex Jones recent statements indicating he has “1000” times more incriminating evidence, and a ‘dead-man’s switch’, Alex Jones may have just made the case that Bill Clinton is ALMOST CERTAINLY a rapist…

This same reasoning can be applied to John Podesta and others possibly connected to #PizzaGate…

Download Video Notes: https://1drv.ms/b/s!As32ynv0LoaIhucoY-41EDNxWsxIWg

View Video Notes on Steemit: https://steemit.com/pizzagate/@mes/video-notes-pizzagate-part-16-alex-jones-vs-bill-clinton