This is why I no longer believe grand conspiracy theories. It creates shadowy bad guys like the illuminati without needing any evidence. It's like a kids cartoon of good giys verses bad guys but the world is more complicated than that. I do believe there are a small group of people who hold tremendous power in the world, but it seems more accurate to me that they are not united but instead brokering for power against each other and governments.
To say voting is completely fake is an interesting one. I get how electric voting machines may have issues and wouldn't it be fun if that was exposed, but it's a jump for me to think all the people involve doing in recounts are just makings stuff up. Any way, thanks for answering my question.
I agree the top puppet masters are battling for control. At this point I'd say David Rotchild is number one with David Rockafella and George Sorarse close behind. The control center is based in zionist owned Israel. Clowns like Barry Soetoro and Killery Klinton are bottom rung puppets. Donald Chump is a puppet too, it's just hard to pick if he is making some non controlled twitches at this point.
Your memes are funny, but I don't understand your argument.
"Quoting Snopes is content"? As in, that's something worth talking about in it's own right as content outside of the discussed topic? "This person quoted Snopes. Heh." Sure, you can call that content but its irrelevant to the argument being made. See genetic fallacy again. Are you arguing the genetic fallacy isn't a valid concept?
If an argument stands on its own based on the evidence presented, can you help me understand how the source matters and is "content" worthy of being included in the argument?
Either way, I linked to Gizmodo and Rational Wiki, not Snopes. Was there something about the content of their argument as to why much of this pizzagate thing is silly which is irrational or fallacious?
Or do you just like sharing memes and LOLing...? If so, I won't waste time responding further.
I remember getting into a similar sort of disagreement with you about global warming.
You are clearly intelligent, well educated and a very fast typist.
But you are a believer and I'm a skeptic to put it in broad terms.
I'm also a slow typist and like to post pictures - a picture is often worth a thousand words as they say.
This is a direct quote from your Gizmono article - it is so clueless as to destroy all credibility of the site for evermore:
"Pizzagate has been debunked by Snopes and the New York Times, and one of its biggest communities—r/pizzagate—was booted off Reddit for the repeated release of personally identifiable information, as Gizmodo reported last week"
Snopes is of interest because it is a propagnda site funded by George Soros that is widely quoted by the corporate media. Quoting snopes is beyond clueless.
Pizzagate is not some outrageous claim, it's the tip of huge iceberg that has been discussed widely since the late 90's. I first heard of the NWO pedophile stuff in 1991...
Well, global warming, and that Pizzagate is fake for starters.
And possibly a belief that an actual process of voting really takes place - I agree that voting is a waste of time but think that the process of vote counting is entirely fake. Yes that does mean that Soros or whoever decided to switch to Chump over Killery at the last moment.
So that may indicate a pattern of you believing mainstream media programming, but I havn't really checked your posts properly and am just basing this on three posts that come to mind.
"My face when some commits a genetic fallacy."
Debate the content of the argument, not the source.
I'd say quoting snopes IS content!
This is why I no longer believe grand conspiracy theories. It creates shadowy bad guys like the illuminati without needing any evidence. It's like a kids cartoon of good giys verses bad guys but the world is more complicated than that. I do believe there are a small group of people who hold tremendous power in the world, but it seems more accurate to me that they are not united but instead brokering for power against each other and governments.
To say voting is completely fake is an interesting one. I get how electric voting machines may have issues and wouldn't it be fun if that was exposed, but it's a jump for me to think all the people involve doing in recounts are just makings stuff up. Any way, thanks for answering my question.
People seem to get so many aspects of the fake election, but not the bit about all the vote counting being totally fake!
http://www.globalresearch.ca/entire-us-presidential-election-is-fake-from-start-to-finish/5544436
I agree the top puppet masters are battling for control. At this point I'd say David Rotchild is number one with David Rockafella and George Sorarse close behind. The control center is based in zionist owned Israel. Clowns like Barry Soetoro and Killery Klinton are bottom rung puppets. Donald Chump is a puppet too, it's just hard to pick if he is making some non controlled twitches at this point.
How much is the likes of Soros paying you for your sh#tty trol job?
Does your epistemology actually lead you to believe someone is paying me to ask questions or point out things I think are inconsistent?
If you're just trolling for a response, then well done! Here's my response. Enjoy.
Your memes are funny, but I don't understand your argument.
"Quoting Snopes is content"? As in, that's something worth talking about in it's own right as content outside of the discussed topic? "This person quoted Snopes. Heh." Sure, you can call that content but its irrelevant to the argument being made. See genetic fallacy again. Are you arguing the genetic fallacy isn't a valid concept?
If an argument stands on its own based on the evidence presented, can you help me understand how the source matters and is "content" worthy of being included in the argument?
Either way, I linked to Gizmodo and Rational Wiki, not Snopes. Was there something about the content of their argument as to why much of this pizzagate thing is silly which is irrational or fallacious?
Or do you just like sharing memes and LOLing...? If so, I won't waste time responding further.
I remember getting into a similar sort of disagreement with you about global warming.
You are clearly intelligent, well educated and a very fast typist.
But you are a believer and I'm a skeptic to put it in broad terms.
I'm also a slow typist and like to post pictures - a picture is often worth a thousand words as they say.
This is a direct quote from your Gizmono article - it is so clueless as to destroy all credibility of the site for evermore:
"Pizzagate has been debunked by Snopes and the New York Times, and one of its biggest communities—r/pizzagate—was booted off Reddit for the repeated release of personally identifiable information, as Gizmodo reported last week"
Snopes is of interest because it is a propagnda site funded by George Soros that is widely quoted by the corporate media. Quoting snopes is beyond clueless.
Pizzagate is not some outrageous claim, it's the tip of huge iceberg that has been discussed widely since the late 90's. I first heard of the NWO pedophile stuff in 1991...
sift666, 100 thumbs up.
What am I believer of?
Well, global warming, and that Pizzagate is fake for starters.
And possibly a belief that an actual process of voting really takes place - I agree that voting is a waste of time but think that the process of vote counting is entirely fake. Yes that does mean that Soros or whoever decided to switch to Chump over Killery at the last moment.
So that may indicate a pattern of you believing mainstream media programming, but I havn't really checked your posts properly and am just basing this on three posts that come to mind.