Post's URL / URL del post:
https://peakd.com/hive-156509/@chopiliart/the-harlequin-a-mysterious-character-drawingwithstories-or-chopiliart
Source of the Art Plagiarism / Fuente del Plagio:
https://www.obrasdarte.com/luiz-de-souza-a-arte-como-forma-de-ver-a-vida-por-edmundo-cavalcanti/?lang=en#prettyPhoto[gallery]/13/
Artist / Artista: Luis de Souza
This is Jaguar Force,
Reporting Directly from the Jungle.
Onwards!
This isn't plagiarism. It is ridiculous to call it plagiarism. Obviously I already told you that, but just putting it on chain. The images look nothing alike and saying that the artist took elements from other artwork isn't enough to classify something as plagiarism. That's called being an artist. It's all inspired by something, or there's elements taken from here or there, reinterpreted, changed, added to, etc. That's how art works.
This is not abusive to Hive and not listing every inspiration for art that you post is not deception. That is not a reasonable expectation and this sort of subjective interpretation of abuse is actively harming the user experience here and therefore everyone's investment.
Duly noted. And as I already told you the source is not cited, and it says its "original". Thats not original.
Well darling.... you will be shut down.
I noticed you may have missed some crucial points on plagiarism. IP laws allows transfomatory art such that if an artist's changes atleast 10 things either by addition or subtraction,the art becomes distinct from the 'original' becoming it's own original. The term 'original' covers such transformation done by an artist in his own style. It's the same principle of transformation that permits parody of copyright items.
The second point is that there are images in the public domain or royalty free from copyrights which can be used in whole or part without credits or references. Sites like Shutterstock grant permission to use images bought however the buyer chooses without credits.
#Just saying
The one that is missing the nuances is you.
1)Plagiarism and IP laws are related but different concepts,
you can incur in plagiarism without infringing IP law, and you can infringe IP law without incurring in plagiarism.
2)Even in the sufficiently transformed artwork that you mention credit to the transformed work is due so that curators can see what exactly the transformation consists of, what are the additions and what belongs to the transformed work, for in its absence the whole work is assumed to be the work of the user, which is not the case.
3)It's not precisely the same legal principle or rationale that allows for transformations in the form of parody, which is based on the fact that mostly nobody would authorize a parody of their work, even though both fall under the broad category of fair use, they are distinct principles and rationales.
4)Even in the case of images in the public domain or that are free from copyright, which legally can be used in whole or part without credit or references, credit is due on Hive nonetheless since in it absence the image is implicitly assumed to be the work of the user, especially when posted in artistic tags, and hence rewarded monetarily under that assumption. Just like you cannot mount a commercial, photography exhibition with pixabay photos claiming to be the author of the photographs or publish a written work that is in the public domain and claim you are the author, for in such cases, even if you are not infringing the license or distribution rights, you are incurring in plagiarism, which is taking the work of others and attempting to pass them as your own.
Thank you.
Investigate this!
It is said out there that:
"Jaguar is Walden"
You should investigate, that could stain your reputation.
https://steemit.com/spanish/@bigdude/steemit-necesita-heroes-no-acosadores-de-mujeres-walden-un-hombre-sin-honor
https://steemit.com/culture-change/@booster/cutting-support-for-people-who-has-abused-our-trust
How. on. earth. is. this. called. plagiarism?
You don't even take the time to write about it anymore LOL. But yes let's copy-paste photos from other people, put the sources, call it plagiarism, and get $50 on each post. It sounds familiar to me... hmm, oh right. "abuse". 😀
Edit: Oh okay apparently you don't get $50 on each post anymore haha
Ok, how would you like to call it? Pizza?
No I will call it lack of alternate income for you, darling!
Oh, and this is the last time I am commenting on your post. After this it will just be downvotes.
Sushi?
It's not okay. In my opinion he's doing more harm than good.
You use other people’s content to try and make money from them. You are one of the biggest abusers here on the platform. You cannot do anything original at all.
Mental gymnastics much?
You could be a good hunter, but your problem is that when there is nothing to report, you make it up. You do whatever is need to farm, scaring the users and making them go away from Hive. Your selfish farming and toxicity ruins the value of this place with your behavior. Did you ever consider that you are throwing rocks over your own roof? The less value has Hive, the less you are gonna farm. Is the same thing that the other abusers don't understand too.
Anyway, I'm glad to see how your days of abuse are about to end soon.
Amen
Congratulations @jaguar.force! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
You can view your badges on your board And compare to others on the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPTo support your work, I also upvoted your post!
Do not miss the last post from @hivebuzz:
Support the HiveBuzz project. Vote for our proposal!
Just came to have some fun darling,lol
When @azircon calls you darling, be scared lol
Hahaha, where was Azircon all this time? Nice to see some real action against Jaguar finally!
lmao, what a fucking joke.