To a great extent, apparently. And we don't have to be involved. I think it's just an avenue he's attaching to the whole of things, but we didn't actually exist during the time in question. However, we exist now, and the time in question has not subsided. The ad ban is still in place.
Also, I just posted the video so it's up now.
Yup, that's key.
It is, and YouTube is in at least two significant court cases defending why it fails to take down crypto scams (Section 230 will be their defence). That won't look good when, on the other side of the world, they'll try saying "we censored legit businesses to protect our users".... which as we can see in court in the US, they're still failing to do in other ways that DO NOT hurt their business model.
Having said that, if they were to drop all restrictions now, it wouldn't affect our case because they did the crime and the damage already.