Honestly am not a good historian.but I must say that war is inevitable for a desired outcome. It's either being lead or leading for personal interest which we want,those seeing what glory lies ahead wouldn't want to share the spoils equally, wouldn't want to rub shoulders evenly so the law comes into play. To put at bay the strong physically but protect the strong mentally to keep in line with thier interest and keep the strong physically under thier feet. Making their selves stronger and building an impenetrable castle,with the physically strong and yet enslaving them to be at peace when actually they are in the middle of a cold choas war. When I began reading this article it struck my mind that the poor adhere to the law and the richest make the law to suit them from bridging the gap between the poor. The origin of the law I presume was for fairness and equity but I wonder if it lost its taste or its just a cooking pot. Wars will come and go in different forms but who is willing to let go for peace. let's ponder on the tower of Babel of old on this it will never end for all will match for a just course to achieve a sole aim but different languages different culture different races how possible will it be to merge them? Thus the law imperfect but perfect in a way to avert total colossal damage.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: