Inaugur renée silhou,
yearning essentia primus
manteau mimeo inveigled -
Eclipse harkens effulgent
naiveté sequined verdant
candor’s plenum autarchic
Euphuistical locution vitiate,
libretto fiendish, aria spectral
viva voce croons roentgen,
couloir ebonized sycophant—
Ululate arcadian runes, flaked
veins melanose aperçu halcion
thoughts riehl, chromasial soledad
unciphers lusus; punctures preux
Atonal incendo dawns feral
razing sanguine, ensembling
noisome venom reecho pura-
Diorama fuchsian, exhibit adieu
a refulgent claret, flaring piceous
sauvignon rio grande — daubed
optic streams alveolal.
Excellent article. I learned a lot of interesting and cognitive. I'm screwed up with you, I'll be glad to reciprocal subscription))
[Written months previously in an altogether expressively jaundiced different frame(s)-of-mind (in 'person') structure/outline/syntax to current themes] - ‘in keeping’ with partisan inclinations that the reader must encounter the cumulative strangeness in a text which requites similar disruptive incursions (frustratingly provoking the abyssal-yearning question ?: ‘‘is this ‘it’?, do ‘sensible’ facts correspond to a posteriori/a priori reality (that we can have questions to the latter, is this conception aligned to the concoction ‘I’ have been voluntarily-forcibly assimilated ‘into’; -underlining the weighty-perspicacious faculties/burdens of mind), universality reducible to a singular & vice-versa therein; or does the tête-à-tête mischievously delight (although reminding slavish judgement through the blush, the rheumatic hand tics, slight discolorative pallor of the temples where guiltier-for-'existence' sweat droops heavily, clinging to bodily organism) in its own conversation while conditioning ‘our’ responses?