I disagree with your article, it assumes people aren't worth the money it costs to protect them. Holding those who are supposed to protect them accountable is worth the monetary cost. If you examine the monetary system it doesn't work forever anyway. We only compile debt and never resolve it... What does it matter if things cost money if we don't have to that money back?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The article wasn't only referring to financial cost.. perhaps you didn't read it?