Satianic Pedophile?, probably missed the glaring discrepancy between ONE and MANY, exactly why you should consider not opening your mouth and saying "I'm confused" with the ... to hint that expectation for someone to spoon feed you some information..
BUT
Let's consider for one moment that you typed both "is" and "pedophile" wrong, extending to you an ungodly benefit of doubt.
What excuses your incredulous tone behind
...
which you chose instead of explaining EXACTLY what you were confused about? ABSO-FUCKINGLUTELY-NOTHING YOU TROLL!
The other certainty is that as a trollish comment it says milliards about your future on steem: I SEE YOU.
Oh, this is rich. First of all, it's a convention to use "is" when implying a singular subject. Not sure how pedophile was typed incorrectly, although in Greek it would in fact be "paedophile" to distinguish from a person who loves feet. And, last I checked, confusion is perfectly acceptable when "satanic pedophile" is a phrase that is used in any context. The only pedophilia scandal I currently know about is Milo Yiannopoulos' rather out of context interview, although if you were referencing pizzagate, I'm still very confused. Perhaps you could explain all of this from the beginning? I'm new to US politics.