Thanks for posting this.
I can understand why you did your little joke about the letters, but even in the link you posted, that guy is a heterosexual pedophile, so that kind of blows that one out the water.
I have a child and I would rather all pedophiles were like this guy, he's honest and he doesn't act out on his fantasies, so we know who he is and where he is. I'd much rather that, than some 'respectable' member of the community, hiding behind said respectability so that they can abuse children.
I think if therapy doesn't work, then chemical castration is the only thing that will give him and others like him peace.
I agree with your view.
Words on the street is that he already acted on it.. http://louderwithcrowder.com/salon-com-pedophile-calls-me-out-but-now-ive-dug-into-his-past/#.V0RjSxmp7qA
Edit: And Trannies are not necessarily gay...so LGBT is only a group of people with a set of value related to sexual orientation and/or sexual identity.
I stand corrected, re LGBT and don't get me wrong, I think the guy's predelictions are horrible and I think chemical castration, until we can find another way is the best solution. However the only way we can chemically castrate, is if people either get caught red-handed, in which case, human rights, blah, blah, blah.
Or they "come out" like this guy, if they truly don't want to offend, then they'll volunteer; don't they already have a similar program going on in the States?
CG
Words on the street are presenting a screenshot of a post where he says he brushes her hair, and in the same sentences demand a bullet for the guy.
The blogger starts his entry with "Being Conservative is literally viewed as more offensive than the fondling of children". I'd tell him that it's not the being conservative, but the disregard for basic human rights and disrespect for anything that doesn't fit into his narrow view of the world. But he wouldn't understand.
He is a pedophile who babysit a five years old and relieves himself in the bathroom...and we must all cheer him for not "acting" on it? wtf.
Some people are screwed up and they should be call out on it...not given a megaphone. And I agree with him:
No
For what purpose? It doesn't serve anyone.
Besides that the article itself utilizes the false claim that brushing her hair would be comparable to touching her sexually (seriously, that thing is worse than shit. the guy is just ranting. how can you "inform" yourself with sources like that? The article on salon contains some real information. You may not like it, you may not be interested in him and how a life like this looks from the inside, but others certainly do because they like to make informed decisions before they form their opinion): I don't put myself in the position to deny others the right to live. Violating that basic right would make me worse than the perpetrator, and I would have to keep living with it. And I'm glad the civilized world realized that and abolished death penalties.