you can't beat fascism by just ignoring it, you can't give them any platform what-so-ever. Especially since they are already in power lmao. Anybody who defends fascists is a fascist. It's as simple as that.
I think we both write for the readers, and not each other here. It is not you who I hope to convince. It is someone reading this, someone who is less involved, and doesn't feel like they have to be right or wrong in this situation. They can just observe.
When I attack, you feel pressure, yes? Well, you've struck the first blow, so I am only defending myself. You have rung the bell of oppression by playing the "no platform for _______" card.
The idea of removing speech from your enemy is a wicked thing to do. If I have an enemy to defeat, I at least want to hear their cries and pathetic insults as they run. After all: What if they are right? What if the words they speak are so wise and persuasive that the only way to win against them is to mute them?
That is the implication here. If I hear the ideas of your enemy, I might be convinced, yes? Is that how it is? Is that your fear? Your fears speak volumes, so I advocate for courage over fear.
Knowledge over ignorance.
In a battle of words, muting the enemy is cheating, and a dishonorable tactic, and I will never condone it. Not for me, not for you, and not for them. You are behaving without honor, and that is seriously troublesome.
I recommend you right yourself, and remember what it is like to walk proudly. If you are going to insult me, at least be subtle about it, and a bit clever too. The readers will not enjoy your tasteless insults, and you will lose another round against me.
If you have free speech guaranteed, then even if they win, you can still fight back in the future. But chains wrapped around your mouth can take awhile to rust, so I'd prefer that they never appear in the first place.
If you truly wish to implement the precedent of "No platform for my enemy," then it'd be quite troublesome for you if it was implemented against your political faction. That's why I recommend a healthy defense of free speech.
Both sides can continue their fight for whatever silly things they "believe" in, if they both can speak freely. Foolish humans. A heretical kitten really is the fool for ever engaging these humans over their little political beliefs.
But still, these little animal growls humans make can be quite ferocious if they can write or speak well.
you can't beat fascism by just ignoring it, you can't give them any platform what-so-ever. Especially since they are already in power lmao. Anybody who defends fascists is a fascist. It's as simple as that.
you are a joke
I think we both write for the readers, and not each other here. It is not you who I hope to convince. It is someone reading this, someone who is less involved, and doesn't feel like they have to be right or wrong in this situation. They can just observe.
When I attack, you feel pressure, yes? Well, you've struck the first blow, so I am only defending myself. You have rung the bell of oppression by playing the "no platform for _______" card.
The idea of removing speech from your enemy is a wicked thing to do. If I have an enemy to defeat, I at least want to hear their cries and pathetic insults as they run. After all: What if they are right? What if the words they speak are so wise and persuasive that the only way to win against them is to mute them?
That is the implication here. If I hear the ideas of your enemy, I might be convinced, yes? Is that how it is? Is that your fear? Your fears speak volumes, so I advocate for courage over fear.
Knowledge over ignorance.
In a battle of words, muting the enemy is cheating, and a dishonorable tactic, and I will never condone it. Not for me, not for you, and not for them. You are behaving without honor, and that is seriously troublesome.
I recommend you right yourself, and remember what it is like to walk proudly. If you are going to insult me, at least be subtle about it, and a bit clever too. The readers will not enjoy your tasteless insults, and you will lose another round against me.
If you have free speech guaranteed, then even if they win, you can still fight back in the future. But chains wrapped around your mouth can take awhile to rust, so I'd prefer that they never appear in the first place.
If you truly wish to implement the precedent of "No platform for my enemy," then it'd be quite troublesome for you if it was implemented against your political faction. That's why I recommend a healthy defense of free speech.
Both sides can continue their fight for whatever silly things they "believe" in, if they both can speak freely. Foolish humans. A heretical kitten really is the fool for ever engaging these humans over their little political beliefs.
But still, these little animal growls humans make can be quite ferocious if they can write or speak well.