You are making several erroneous assumptions about the left, the first being that all of the left supports violence. As for the non-aggression principle, it is those who support property who are the true aggressors.
You are making several erroneous assumptions about the left, the first being that all of the left supports violence. As for the non-aggression principle, it is those who support property who are the true aggressors.
The left take property from those who have it and giving it to those who don't. You cannot do this in the general case without violence. Sure, some people will be fine with it, but most people are only "fine" with it because of the threats of force that back the demand for compliance.
If you don't believe in property, that means that you wouldn't defend yourself from an attacker.