Anachism comes in many flavors. All one needs to abide y is "no rulers" and they can call themselves anarchist really... That's why I mentioned anrcho-voluntaryist to be more precise about having moral principles ;) It may be infiltrated groups that did the vandalizing, but I think not, and that their brand of anarchism is more in line with the perception most people have: chaos creation.That's the shitty anarchism I find, where they drop the "rulers" but also ditch rules at the same time, rejecting moral principles or failing to understand them and justifying immoral actions.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
No rulers and on the path to further individual liberty is what I would hope for from my friends. How you get to the objective is not important to me either, and the more varied our approaches the better off our cause is and the sooner the objective will be obtained.