You'll notice that the people crapping on Milo are the same ones who deny the existence of pedophilia until they want to ascribe it to someone they don't like. The hypocrisy of the globalists is tedious.
The leftists' main tactic, at least these days, is name calling and social shaming. They are being bullied to go farther left, and right wing and libertarian movements have been pushed underground online (where they actually are gaining power)
I'm sure there were right wing movements that did this in the past, but at this point in time the main threat to free speech is the name-calling left.
The leftists are doing it now, it was the rightists in the 1980's. Whoever can be seen using the tyrants tactics and strategies is readily identifiable. The authoritarian dynamic is obvious. Saul Alinsky was a poor man's Machiavelli, but he distilled the material for his instruction manual for subversion well. Ridicule works in the minds of the simple, whether it be the ridiculer or the ridiculed.
The hordes rising to destroy the truth is how secret societies are born.
If you want to know who rules, look for them who cannot be criticized.
by making this completely unfounded assumption
"people crapping on Milo are the same ones who deny the existence of pedophilia"
and then using that as an overgeneralization to stereotype anyone who doesn't agree with you.."hypocrisy of the globalists is tedious"
All that has to be done is to look at the news outlets, editors, and journalists who are doing both things. This is easy to verify, and educational. I guess it is just easier to name call.
You referred to me as someone who's logic is almost unfathomably ridiculous. I'd say that is fairly clear. My first comment was meant to be an observation. logic comes after observation, but aren't you implying you already know that? Fallacies and dissembling do not become the intelligent. Your choice now is to show Steemit which one you are. I am perfectly content for Steemit to examine my logic. If I am wrong, please explain it to me, rather than name calling.
You'll notice that the people crapping on Milo are the same ones who deny the existence of pedophilia until they want to ascribe it to someone they don't like. The hypocrisy of the globalists is tedious.
lifeworship, I agree on your logic
Thank you.
Your logic is almost unfathomably ridiculous.
There's a claim, how so? Do you have some logic of your own, or are you just name calling?
The leftists' main tactic, at least these days, is name calling and social shaming. They are being bullied to go farther left, and right wing and libertarian movements have been pushed underground online (where they actually are gaining power)
I'm sure there were right wing movements that did this in the past, but at this point in time the main threat to free speech is the name-calling left.
The leftists are doing it now, it was the rightists in the 1980's. Whoever can be seen using the tyrants tactics and strategies is readily identifiable. The authoritarian dynamic is obvious. Saul Alinsky was a poor man's Machiavelli, but he distilled the material for his instruction manual for subversion well. Ridicule works in the minds of the simple, whether it be the ridiculer or the ridiculed.
The hordes rising to destroy the truth is how secret societies are born.
If you want to know who rules, look for them who cannot be criticized.
by making this completely unfounded assumption
"people crapping on Milo are the same ones who deny the existence of pedophilia"
and then using that as an overgeneralization to stereotype anyone who doesn't agree with you.."hypocrisy of the globalists is tedious"
All that has to be done is to look at the news outlets, editors, and journalists who are doing both things. This is easy to verify, and educational. I guess it is just easier to name call.
you appear to be grossly mistaken how logic works. I also, don't see anywhere in my posts where I name-called.
You referred to me as someone who's logic is almost unfathomably ridiculous. I'd say that is fairly clear. My first comment was meant to be an observation. logic comes after observation, but aren't you implying you already know that? Fallacies and dissembling do not become the intelligent. Your choice now is to show Steemit which one you are. I am perfectly content for Steemit to examine my logic. If I am wrong, please explain it to me, rather than name calling.